Qualcosa per i lettori italiani in italiano:
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
The international elite have, up until now, found ways to manage our democracy through the established political parties. Parties like the Freedom Party in the Netherlands are showing the people the way back to political significance. For too long the voice of the people as been managed and twisted so that it can be ignored.
The days when the elite can place a list of unsatisfactory candidates on a ballot form and call it democracy are well and truly over. During the last few weeks in Britain, we have seen the result of attracting that sort of ‘talent’ to public life. Democracy will soon be taken back from the multinationals who found a way to steel it and it will be returned to the people. All the people have to do is to totally reject the mainstream parties who have brought nothing but disaster and colonisation to our countries. Vote out the failed political establishment!
Friday, May 29, 2009
The following is the interview that we conducted with Swedish Police during the recent International Civil Liberties Alliance Counter Jihad fact-finding tour of Malmo:
Hat Tip: Gates of Vienna and Tundra Tabloids, and thanks to Vlad Tepes.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
The following YouTube footage from lutonmay24th2009 (Hat Tip: Lionheart) shows a demonstration in Luton on 24 May 2009 (WARNING: there is bad language in some of the footage):
The scenes in Luton were simultaneously depressing and encouraging. They were depressing because I do not like aggressive demonstrations and would like to see calm and rational debate on the issue of Islamisation. They were encouraging in the sense that the people in Luton were standing up for their right to be listened to. It appears that there are many people in Luton who are now actively engaging in politics and trying as best they can to understand the social milieu that surrounds them and influences their lives. I am in no way endorsing this style of protest and would encourage all those who oppose Islamisation to do so in a civilised and non violent way. However, I can understand that people feel pent up frustration about being ignored.
I suppose that aggressive protest from some elements within the large swath of the population who are concerned about Islamisation was inevitable given the tolerance that the authorities have shown when the Islamists engaged in more aggressive forms of activism. People will remember how an Islamist mob chased police who timidly retreated through the streets of London.
The sight of people in balaclavas is of course chilling, but this is no different to Islamist demonstrations where people conceal their identities with Palestinian headscarves or the chadri. Those protesting in Luton probably felt that what was sauce for the goose could certainly be sauce for the gander.
It appears that a great deal of public money is being put into the Muslim community to combat ‘radicalisation’ but this to many appears to be a reward for bad behaviour. Where is the investment to salve the hurt feelings and social isolation of other people in places like Luton. It seems that young people in other communities may also becoming ‘radicalised’, so where is their radicalisation money? It also seems that the aggressive approach of protest by some Muslim groups has resulted in the erosion of some of our cherished British values such as freedom of expression. It would appear that it is the policy of the British Government is to give rewards to whoever shouts the loudest. This is a very wrong and a very dangerous approach to statecraft and acts to undermine the basic building blocks of civil society. I suspect that the protest in Luton was, to some degree at least, an unconscious reaction to this Government tendency. It also appears that when any ‘dialogue’ takes place under the heading of ‘community cohesion’ tends to be a one way process where anything Western is viewed as expendable. From this perspective the people at the protest in Luton probably felt that the cards are always stacked against them.
Our Government continuously rebukes young people to become interested in and involved in politics, yet when people get involved they are demonised. It seems that the political establishment’s idea of democracy is one where the masses vote from a narrow list of candidates. This is the sort of democracy that exists in China where people are asked to choose between candidates selected by the Communist Party, or in Iran where people can only vote for candidates approved by the Mullahs. This approach means that those who disagree with the status quo have no means to express themselves at the ballot box. This of course allows frustration and anger to build up and fester. In the modern West it would appear that the needs of ‘Davos Culture’ are the main consideration in the organisation of political culture. This means that the financial interests of an international elite takes precedence over the will of the people. Those who really run the world want to be able to move people from country to country as the needs of their economic enterprises dictate. This, of course, is why we have immigration, the doctrine of multiculturalism, and Islamisation. Under this system any dissent that threatens the economic interests of the elite has to be crushed. This is done by:
- demonization of those who object to the deconstruction of their society
- the formulation of ‘heresy laws’ to prevent free speech and to criminalise dissent
controlling the media and the education system
- effectively engaging in gerrymandering by importing voters from the Third World
- cow and demoralise any opposition by making people believe that the intolerable situation is somehow inevitable.
demonising any political organisation which doesn’t toe the line
Establishment politicians are at the beck and call of the international elite and as such it is not possible for them to question the system. They are left to pretend that issues that they are not allowed to debate will simply go away. This is undoubtedly the reason for the Labour Party’s abandonment of the white working class who have perhaps suffered the most from mass immigration. Perhaps this is the reason for the more aggressive demonstration seen in Luton and why it might not be an isolated event. Chants of ‘we want our country back’ demonstrate clearly what they want from the Government and this is one thing that establishment parties are not allowed to grant to them. British freedom is in a real mess at the moment!
Posted by Aeneas at Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Monday, May 25, 2009
As this is a university city the indoctrination system of leftist infiltrated higher education is probably responsible. Over indulged middle class students often unthinkingly stumble into left wing politics because they thing that it is somehow clever or trendy. This tendency is a serious weakness of our collective Western culture and more rational governments would be at least trying to develop remedies. The following image of Karl Marx was displayed in a window in Lund:
Copenhagen does indeed appear to be a centre of opposition to Islamisation this summer. First we have the event organised by the International Free Press Society, then we have the International Civil Liberties Alliance Counter Jihad Conference, and tomorrow we have SIOE’s conference about EuroMed in the Danish Parliament.
Posted by Aeneas at Monday, May 25, 2009
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Why Netanyahu should push forward with settlements and give Obama and his so-called peace process the finger
Netanyahu should tell Obama to go to hell. The arrogance and self defeating approach the Obama administration coupled with its foolhardiness and comical capers when it comes to foreign policy means that he should be defied. In any case the man has not got the bottle to make a difficult decision whatever happens in the world. He has show very clearly that in terms of foreign policy he just gives in to resistance. It seems that all he wants is an easy life a time to enjoy being President of the United States of America.
Israel can’t afford to be a friend to America while Obama, or someone who shares his views, is President. To be friends with Obama means consigning the state of Israel to the history books and no state can ever afford to adopt such a suicidal policy. Even if America is willing to commit national suicide by aligning itself with the Islamic world, Israel is not obliged to follow her off the cliff.
Detractors to such a policy might say that Israel needs America because of the aid that it provides. This is utter nonsense, as the non-aligned movement during the Cold War demonstrated. The non aligned movement compelled the superpowers compete with one another for the favour of its members. When it comes down to it the Arabian Middle East despises America and the West. A more assertive Israeli policy would place the Obama administration on the horns of a dilemma. Israel has other options.
If America under the Obama administration aided and abetted by the anti Israel EU continues to malign, persecute, and defame the state of Israel then in the interests of rational statecraft Israel should cut loose from the West and make other arrangements to ensure its national survival. The most logical alternative to the West is an alliance with Russia. In any case, with rampant Islamisation of the effeminate West, Russia is probably a safer long term bet.
Israel has been the destination for vast numbers of Russian Jews who understand and appreciate the nuances of Russian culture and Russian is widely spoken in Israel. New waves of Russian Jews could also assist in the process of establishing new settlements in Judea and Samaria. It wouldn’t take long to consolidate Jewish settlement in the ancient Jewish heartland. Arabs would learn to live with such a process and in the final analysis would benefit in material terms; they would have more money, enjoy more freedoms, and would not have to suffer the barbarity of sharia law inflicted on their cousins in Gaza.
Another advantage of an alliance with Russia would be that they would no longer have to endure the embarrassment and self inflicted guilt of being part of the West. The do gooders in America and Western Europe would find other, Western, targets for their treasonous rage.
When a country is fighting for its very existence friends who effectively stab it in the back must be dispensed with. The realignment of Israel, a country and a culture that has made an immense contribution to Western Civilisation, would be a great loss to the West. It would be a shame if our leaders, who seem determined to align themselves with those that want to destroy and enslave us, continue to get their way and alienate our true friends in the process. The interests of the people of the Western world, including Israel, are at odds with those who currently hold political power in Washington and Brussels. We need urgent adoption of pro Western policies and the leaders who are willing to formulate and implement them.
Delegates attended from Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Romania, Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States. In order to achieve maximum impact for the policies that we developed, relevant information will be communicated to members of our global network for countries that could not send delegates on this occasion.
This was a working meeting, and boy did we work! We had just two days to achieve a great deal and we met all the ambitious targets that we set ourselves. Many initiatives were developed and will be implemented in all parts of our network. I cannot go into detail for reasons of security but the counter jihad will be moving forward with great speed in 2009/10 and the initiatives developed in Copenhagen will have a many useful and practical consequences.
The Global Counter Jihad is now in a very strong position indeed, much work has been taking place behind the scenes and we have overlapping, interconnected, decentralised networks operating globally. These networks will be used to implement the many policies and initiatives that we have now developed. In many ways the recent conference in Copenhagen has brought the work of previous conferences together resulting in a synergy that has produced many unexpected though very useful practical results.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
We paid a visit to the famous Jihad Driving School, a must for any counter jihad tourist wanting to see the future of European driving instruction. There were funny looks from locals as we crossed such sites off in our guide books.
Residents of Herrgården seemed to be marking their territory as Dar Al Islam by using Arabic style lettering, how long will it be before actual Arabic is used in such areas and on street signs? I wonder if such concessions for Arabic culture are paid for out of the public purse. When does the anti Western madness stop, how much more ‘enrichment’ can western society cope with before it ceases to exist in a coherent form?
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
The following video is from HairyChestnuts and is entitled ‘Vote of no confidence’:
The British political establishment have driven the country to a state of ruin and are unfit to govern. It is therefore imperative that people vote in the forthcoming European elections and vote for any party so long as it is not Labour, the Conservatives, or the Liberal Democrats. A vote for the big three parties is a vote for more of the same and a vote for those who it would appear have nothing but contempt for the British people. If enough people follow this advice then the political map can be redrawn, freedoms that have been stolen from us can be returned, and the standard of political discourse improved.
Monday, May 18, 2009
Monday, May 11, 2009
After constant demands for the opportunity to present their position, such as those detailed HERE, HERE, and HERE, CAIR has declined to attend a discussion at the Premier of the Clarion Fund’s film The Third Jihad. Is CAIR too chicken to debate this issues in this case, or has the film made such a convincing argument that CAIR will soon become an apostate organisation?
It good to see that CAIR may be recognising what many of us already know, namely that its arguments are unconvincing and feeble.
The following is a press release from The Clarion Fund.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CLARION UNVEILS NEW FILM ABOUT THE THREAT OF RADICAL ISLAM IN AMERICA AT NATIONAL PRESS CLUB
CAIR DECLINES INVITE TO DISCUSSION WITH DEVOUT MUSLIM
FILM NARRATOR, WHO IS EXPECTED TO SPEAK OUT
AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM AT THE THIRD JIHAD PREMIERE
(New York, NY – May 10, 2009) The Clarion Fund announced today that it will premiere its newest documentary film, The Third Jihad, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, May 13, 2009. In addition to the screening, several American Muslim groups have been invited to participate in a roundtable discussion where the film’s narrator, Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser – a devout Muslim and chairman of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) – and its producers will speak out about the threat of radical Islam in America.
Clarion’s first documentary film, the award-winning Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West, communicates the global threat posed by the radical elements of Islam. The Third Jihad shifts the focus to the growth of radical Islam on American soil via “Cultural Jihad,” the use of the democratic system to transform the American way of life from within to a society governed by Sharia Law (Islamic religious law).
“Clarion Fund recognizes the propagation of radical Islam and the promulgation of Sharia Law within our borders as a clear and present crisis affecting the Muslim American community and the American public at large,” said Peter Connors, Executive Director of Clarion. “Our educational tools and media properties will serve as a platform for the American public – including Muslims – to embrace Western liberties and speak out in a meaningful way to silence radical elements in our midst.”
Among these tools is RadicalIslam.org, the foundation of Clarion’s grassroots movement. The user-friendly website was developed to spread awareness about the threat of radical Islam in America as well as to provide practical response tools. For the launch of the film, the site has been redesigned to include up-to-the-minute updates from major news sources as well as social media-driven networking capabilities.
“We are focused on educating the American public about this eminent threat to their rights and freedoms, with the goal of bringing ‘Creeping Sharia’ to a screeching halt,” explained Raphael Shore, producer of both The Third Jihad and Obsession and the founder of Clarion. “We want to expose the true intent of radical Islam in order to secure the future of the American public at large, including its Muslim community.”
Among those organizations invited to participate in the roundtable discussion is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). However, CAIR has declined the invitation, a surprising turn of events considering the group’s usual insistence that a representative of their “mainstream Muslim” staff be present at such events to offer a “balanced perspective.” In fact, since the beginning of 2009, CAIR has requested such representation in at least three U.S. events focused on radical Islam.
“We invited CAIR and they said they wanted nothing to do with this film,” said Connors. “CAIR’s response is unfortunate, as The Clarion Fund believes that the only way to address this issue is to discuss it openly and honestly with those who agree with us and those who disagree. Then, based on that education, the American public can decide for itself.”
The Third Jihad, which is narrated by devout Muslim American Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, centers on the FBI discovery of a Grand Jihad Manifesto calling for the destruction of the U.S. and the establishment of a radical Islamist theocracy in its place. The film features interviews with experts on radical Islam and American security specialists, including leading expert professor Bernard Lewis, as well as a first-hand account from a former terrorist. All those interviewed agree that the spread of Islamic fundamentalism in America is a societal reality that cannot be ignored.
Though a shortened version of The Third Jihad has spread virally on the Internet since the beginning of the year, the Washington, D.C. screening will serve as the official launch of the feature-length version of the film.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
The following is Filip Dewinter's speech with English subtitles (translation by Piggy Infidel and subtitles by Vlad Tepes and facilitated by Gates of Vienna).
More information about the events in Cologne can be found at Politically Incorrect.
Saturday, May 09, 2009
In a dangerous act of appeasement, President Obama plans to release Islamic fanatics from Gitmo onto the streets of America. This video entitled ‘Tiahrt: No Welfare for Terrorists’ from securefreedom shows voices of opposition to this foolhardy and dangerous policy.
Is this part of an Obama plan to Islamise America? Is he now following the lead of European leaders who seem to determined to Islamise Europe? It seems that the madcap elite of the Western world are now either completely out of control or experiencing some kind of collective mental breakdown.
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
Monday, May 04, 2009
The plight of Delara Derabi was highlighted on this blog on 19 April 2009. I now to inform readers about the sad news that she was killed by the Iranian regime on 1 May 2009. More information can be found at Vlad Tepes. The following video (Hat Tip: Vlad Tepes) from NationNewsAgency is entitled ‘BREAKING NEWS Delara Derabi an innocent girl hanged by the ISLAMIC Republic of IRAN’:
It seems that the new American President is keen to improve relations with the barbarous Iranian regime. In the past commentators have suggested that America has caused problems in the world by supporting tyrannical regimes. Its seems now that Obama is continuing that very same policy and in so doing is debasing the cause of human rights and tarnishing America’s reputation in the world. It is clear that Barak Obama’s policy of appeasement is wrong as well as cowardly.